The followers of the prophet are also predictable.
The liberal neo-marxist biased media and hollywood will declare that this was the best state of the union speech ever delivered.
Obama's followers will continue to act like Obama is a saint and messiah. They will all lovingly declare how happy they are the Bush is gone and their savior is going to save them.
The media especially and likely all followers of the Prophet will constantly blame Bush and the republicans for everything over and over. Regardless of the fact that Obama is spending more in a month on deficits than 8 years of Bush. They will also forget that Nancy and Harry and the Dems were in fact in charge the last 2 years.
The will justify all portions of Obama's speech to ensure that the people continue to believe in the messiah they voted for, continue to wait patiently for things to get better (just like FDR managed), the media will back up Obama's claim that we all must suffer like good workers, while the government fixes all.
The media and all dems will continue to declare that the government should tax and tax until all money is used up. Since for some inexplicable reason the dems feel the government should tax 100% of your income.
It is easy to predict the reaction of the followers of a prophet who thinks he is a saint and treat him like a messiah.
Monday, February 9, 2009
The Prophet Obama speaks in the state of the union speech, opps I mean press conference, here are some of the Political Shaman's predictions
The Prophet Obama will speak today in a few minutes in fact, so here are some predictions about this speech.
The Prophet will create a speech that sounds more like a campaign speech instead of the State of the Union.
The Prophet will predict that the economy will get far worse and that it is the worse since the depression.
The Prophet will predict that all of us(except his liberal buddies in politics and media) will have to suffer more, tighten the belt more, sacrifice more before the economy will get better. (Though keep in mind he himself and the politicians wont suffer at all)
Mr Obama will declare the time of change is at hand a number of times. (achieved by a cabinet full of old school lobbyists of course)
He will declare that he and only he the Prophet can save us all from ourselves.
He will declare all of his new czars that bypass the rest of the cabinet are going to help him ensure that he can fix all problems(This one is amusing because only neo marxist dictators concentrate power by circumventing the normal government procedures with cronies).
He will again say that we have to get away from the policies of the past, while saying that we went from surplus to deficit. We will not point out though that the past policies that created that surplus should be used, while instead he is opting for the FDR era marxist plans which are a proven failure.
He will find away to blame bush without blatantly saying it. Something along the lines of inheriting it, even though Nancy and Harry were actually in charge of the 2/3 of government that matters.
He will declare that the Iraq war is going as well as circumstances allow(somehow deaths under him are ok"it could have been worse" where a single death under bush was unacceptable.)
He will declare that we need to take even more money and do it now to avert the impending disaster that the democrats are hoping happens. While he wont say this, he knows that if he confiscates or borrows 2 trillion in funds and doles that out to his best liberal friends, like unions and universities, he will be assured of having a recession that lasts years, potentially keeping him in power. The longer the democrats wait from the spending package, the harder it will be for them to use it to fund their continued lifestyle and funding keeping their power.
The Prophet Obama will sprinkle the speech with constant comments about how dire everything is and how he and only he can bring the change to fix it.
Mr Obama will also set in motion the economy killing environmental plans to establish a right to pollute and then sell that right to others, all in the name of regulating CO2, which cant be regulated. He is likely to sprinkle the speech with other environmental comments with little substance but all of it guaranteed to kill the economy or delay recovery by years.
He will say nothing of substance nor how exactly he plans to spend this money and he will do his best to ensure he cant be pinned down on anything nor jeapardize his ability to continue to blame Bush for everything.
State of the Union according the the Political Shaman, painful but recoverable if the governement would get the hell out of the way, by not taking 2 trillion and regulating us to death.
State of the Union according to Obama, the world is on the verge of a great depression and the worse is yet to come, so be prepared to sacrifice in the name of the greater good at the cost of your own lifestyle(marxism anyone?)
Maybe Rahm Emmanual should let Obama know he has already won the election and then maybe we will be spared tonights campaign speech.
The Prophet will create a speech that sounds more like a campaign speech instead of the State of the Union.
The Prophet will predict that the economy will get far worse and that it is the worse since the depression.
The Prophet will predict that all of us(except his liberal buddies in politics and media) will have to suffer more, tighten the belt more, sacrifice more before the economy will get better. (Though keep in mind he himself and the politicians wont suffer at all)
Mr Obama will declare the time of change is at hand a number of times. (achieved by a cabinet full of old school lobbyists of course)
He will declare that he and only he the Prophet can save us all from ourselves.
He will declare all of his new czars that bypass the rest of the cabinet are going to help him ensure that he can fix all problems(This one is amusing because only neo marxist dictators concentrate power by circumventing the normal government procedures with cronies).
He will again say that we have to get away from the policies of the past, while saying that we went from surplus to deficit. We will not point out though that the past policies that created that surplus should be used, while instead he is opting for the FDR era marxist plans which are a proven failure.
He will find away to blame bush without blatantly saying it. Something along the lines of inheriting it, even though Nancy and Harry were actually in charge of the 2/3 of government that matters.
He will declare that the Iraq war is going as well as circumstances allow(somehow deaths under him are ok"it could have been worse" where a single death under bush was unacceptable.)
He will declare that we need to take even more money and do it now to avert the impending disaster that the democrats are hoping happens. While he wont say this, he knows that if he confiscates or borrows 2 trillion in funds and doles that out to his best liberal friends, like unions and universities, he will be assured of having a recession that lasts years, potentially keeping him in power. The longer the democrats wait from the spending package, the harder it will be for them to use it to fund their continued lifestyle and funding keeping their power.
The Prophet Obama will sprinkle the speech with constant comments about how dire everything is and how he and only he can bring the change to fix it.
Mr Obama will also set in motion the economy killing environmental plans to establish a right to pollute and then sell that right to others, all in the name of regulating CO2, which cant be regulated. He is likely to sprinkle the speech with other environmental comments with little substance but all of it guaranteed to kill the economy or delay recovery by years.
He will say nothing of substance nor how exactly he plans to spend this money and he will do his best to ensure he cant be pinned down on anything nor jeapardize his ability to continue to blame Bush for everything.
State of the Union according the the Political Shaman, painful but recoverable if the governement would get the hell out of the way, by not taking 2 trillion and regulating us to death.
State of the Union according to Obama, the world is on the verge of a great depression and the worse is yet to come, so be prepared to sacrifice in the name of the greater good at the cost of your own lifestyle(marxism anyone?)
Maybe Rahm Emmanual should let Obama know he has already won the election and then maybe we will be spared tonights campaign speech.
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Tax Evasion, a crime for everyone but Democrat politicians.
So three of the Prophet Obama's appointments are guilty of tax evasion. Two of them have resigned but one is still there and ironically is in charge of the IRS.
We all know had these criminals been republicans the media would have tarred and feathered them and the democrats would have called for jail.
All of these tax evaders are democrats, so we will see very little of them as the media attempts to play the entire controversy down and make it go away.
It can be confirmed that the Democrats do in fact feel they are above the law and will do everything they can to protect themselves at the expense of the people.
Three tax evaders, all of them Obama appointments and there has not been a single instance of anyone in power discussion prosecution.
What other crimes have these politicians committed?
We all know had these criminals been republicans the media would have tarred and feathered them and the democrats would have called for jail.
All of these tax evaders are democrats, so we will see very little of them as the media attempts to play the entire controversy down and make it go away.
It can be confirmed that the Democrats do in fact feel they are above the law and will do everything they can to protect themselves at the expense of the people.
Three tax evaders, all of them Obama appointments and there has not been a single instance of anyone in power discussion prosecution.
What other crimes have these politicians committed?
History, who was in power during recessions and bad times
The Political Shaman reviewed the last 77 congresses on the House.gov and senate.gov websites as well as a list of presidents to determine power.
The evidence shows that the democrats have enjoyed many more years of power and have resided over the vast majority of bad years, recessions and bad ideas, such as their desire to keep slavery or their attempt to help the French get their colony back in Vietnam. The data shows that putting democrats in full control or complete power is certain to result in a very bad economy if not a bad decade in general. While republicans are not 100% capabale of running things well, history shows the few times they were in power resulted in a good economy more often as well as their being the the right side of ideas, such as affirming women the right to vote.
Though it would seem to ensure a good decade the best option is a mix of power, with no one party in full control of anything.
The highest Power is defined as total control of congress and the executive branch with filibuster proof majorities. This is followed by majorities in congress and having the executuve. This is followed by owning 2 of the 3, either the house and senate, the senate and presidency or the house and presidency.
Decades considered good is subjective but there is a general knowledge about the success or desire for certain decades. Such as the 1990s, the 1950s and the 1920s. While decades like the depression, the 1970s, 1960s and the civil war can be considered bad. A reveiw of the economy, what wars existed at the time, general knowledge and research all contributed to determine a good from a bad decade.
The last 77 congresses would begin in the year 1857 with the 35th congress. This congress was chosen because this is the first congress where the republicans were actually a factor in their quest to end slavery.
The last time Republicans had filibuster proof control was the 66th congress in 1921, which was when the Republicans affirmed women had the right to vote. The democrats have enjoyed well over 20 years of filibuster proof control after 1921.
After 1921, the republicans had 3 congresses with full control, while the Democrats have enjoyed 18 congresses in full control, including the current congress. It is noted that all of the congresses of Democrat control are recessions and decades of strife and crisis.
Of the 77 Congresses reviewed, 31 had recessions. Of those 31 recessions, 25 of them were under Democrat control. This is 74% of all recessions that were entirely in democrat hands or the majority of time in recession was under democrat control.
Of the 15 decades that occured during the 77 congresses, 7 of them are considered bad decades. All 7 were under democrat control for all or the overwhelming majority of time. This would include the Great Depression, The 1960s, The 1970s, The 1940s, The Post WW I recession, WW II and the Civil War era. It is noted that the democrats were in control of the Confederacy in their quest to keep slavery and the economy of both the confederacy they controlled and the Union were affected by democrat actions to keep slavery. Additionally, when democrats obtained some control back duing the post civil war era, their attempts to oppress former slaves also created strife in the country as well as the economy.
Of the 8 decades considered good ones, 2 of them were under Rebublican control, which makes republicans the only party that can claim a history of having good decades under their rule. The other 6 decades were under mixed rule, including the 1990s, where republicans controlled congress.
It is noted as well in the 2000s decade, the two recessions at the beginning and at the end, were when Democrats had control of congress. The middle years between recessions were during a republican controlled government.
The evidence shows that the democrats have enjoyed many more years of power and have resided over the vast majority of bad years, recessions and bad ideas, such as their desire to keep slavery or their attempt to help the French get their colony back in Vietnam. The data shows that putting democrats in full control or complete power is certain to result in a very bad economy if not a bad decade in general. While republicans are not 100% capabale of running things well, history shows the few times they were in power resulted in a good economy more often as well as their being the the right side of ideas, such as affirming women the right to vote.
Though it would seem to ensure a good decade the best option is a mix of power, with no one party in full control of anything.
The highest Power is defined as total control of congress and the executive branch with filibuster proof majorities. This is followed by majorities in congress and having the executuve. This is followed by owning 2 of the 3, either the house and senate, the senate and presidency or the house and presidency.
Decades considered good is subjective but there is a general knowledge about the success or desire for certain decades. Such as the 1990s, the 1950s and the 1920s. While decades like the depression, the 1970s, 1960s and the civil war can be considered bad. A reveiw of the economy, what wars existed at the time, general knowledge and research all contributed to determine a good from a bad decade.
The last 77 congresses would begin in the year 1857 with the 35th congress. This congress was chosen because this is the first congress where the republicans were actually a factor in their quest to end slavery.
The last time Republicans had filibuster proof control was the 66th congress in 1921, which was when the Republicans affirmed women had the right to vote. The democrats have enjoyed well over 20 years of filibuster proof control after 1921.
After 1921, the republicans had 3 congresses with full control, while the Democrats have enjoyed 18 congresses in full control, including the current congress. It is noted that all of the congresses of Democrat control are recessions and decades of strife and crisis.
Of the 77 Congresses reviewed, 31 had recessions. Of those 31 recessions, 25 of them were under Democrat control. This is 74% of all recessions that were entirely in democrat hands or the majority of time in recession was under democrat control.
Of the 15 decades that occured during the 77 congresses, 7 of them are considered bad decades. All 7 were under democrat control for all or the overwhelming majority of time. This would include the Great Depression, The 1960s, The 1970s, The 1940s, The Post WW I recession, WW II and the Civil War era. It is noted that the democrats were in control of the Confederacy in their quest to keep slavery and the economy of both the confederacy they controlled and the Union were affected by democrat actions to keep slavery. Additionally, when democrats obtained some control back duing the post civil war era, their attempts to oppress former slaves also created strife in the country as well as the economy.
Of the 8 decades considered good ones, 2 of them were under Rebublican control, which makes republicans the only party that can claim a history of having good decades under their rule. The other 6 decades were under mixed rule, including the 1990s, where republicans controlled congress.
It is noted as well in the 2000s decade, the two recessions at the beginning and at the end, were when Democrats had control of congress. The middle years between recessions were during a republican controlled government.
2 trillion and counting, will the democrats stop stealing our money before the entire GDP is gone?
As is stands today, the democrats are spending 100 billion a day. The Budget coming into this first year of the Prophets rule sees around 4.3 trillion dollars. Within 8 days of Obama, the democrats have added 1.6 trillion more and by today the number is reaching 2 trillion dollars. Adding in the typical State government spending of another 1.5 trillion or more and we have a 7.8 Trillion dollars in government stealing the peoples money and spending it on who knows what.
The entire GDP of the country of only 13.5 trillion, which means the government is taking 58% of all money the United States makes each year. This assumes the democrats stop adding to the budget, which is not likely based on historical evidence. At the rate they are spending, they will have confiscated the entire GDP by July.
Thank you liberals for voting these morons in power. The country will not survive the government confiscating even 58% of the money and we will be in a communist state, should the democrats succeed in confiscating all money by July.
Look at history, FDR FAILED. The new deal did nothing but make a bad recession worse and extend it for an additional 10 years. Of course, if you consider the democrats of the 1930s used the depression as a means to hold power, then the New Deal was a success. Considering Rahm Emmanuel's statement that crisis is good because it is a means to do big (and really dumb) things.
The Political Shaman can predict that the liberal media will always ensure that any bad decision made by the Prophet and his lobbyist buddies will be shown as the best option. The media will achieve this by constantly focusing on how the people must suffer and be patient as the Prophet fixes everything. After all, there is no other way to hide or justify the suffering the people will endure as the government confiscates 58% of the GDP.
The entire GDP of the country of only 13.5 trillion, which means the government is taking 58% of all money the United States makes each year. This assumes the democrats stop adding to the budget, which is not likely based on historical evidence. At the rate they are spending, they will have confiscated the entire GDP by July.
Thank you liberals for voting these morons in power. The country will not survive the government confiscating even 58% of the money and we will be in a communist state, should the democrats succeed in confiscating all money by July.
Look at history, FDR FAILED. The new deal did nothing but make a bad recession worse and extend it for an additional 10 years. Of course, if you consider the democrats of the 1930s used the depression as a means to hold power, then the New Deal was a success. Considering Rahm Emmanuel's statement that crisis is good because it is a means to do big (and really dumb) things.
The Political Shaman can predict that the liberal media will always ensure that any bad decision made by the Prophet and his lobbyist buddies will be shown as the best option. The media will achieve this by constantly focusing on how the people must suffer and be patient as the Prophet fixes everything. After all, there is no other way to hide or justify the suffering the people will endure as the government confiscates 58% of the GDP.
The first Television interview by the Prophet Obama goes to who?
The Prophet Obama has all kinds of choices for his first televised interview. All of the Liberal biased main stream sources, such as ABC, CBS or major cable players also biased like CNN. The Prophet could have chosen Foxnews or NPR.
The motives of this president has to be questioned when his first televised appearance is on an Islamic news station.
It seems calling Obama the Prophet was not far off the mark.
The motives of this president has to be questioned when his first televised appearance is on an Islamic news station.
It seems calling Obama the Prophet was not far off the mark.
Friday, January 23, 2009
How the democrats removed the protections Madison described to prevent the Federal Government from becoming what it is today.
The Founding Fathers of the United States of American did not have unanimous agreement over the creation of the constitution or the creation of the national government of the United States of America. Two of the primary debaters on this subject were James Madison and Patrick Henry. Madison argued for the constitution as it was originally written, believing that some level of centralized national government was needed to protect the people from invasion and some other important tasks. Henry believes the checks and balances designed into the constitution are not enough to safeguard the country from tyranny, especially given that this government would have a military at its disposal.
Both men debated well and the arguments have both been proven right and wrong over time. One of Patrick Henry’s main arguments was about the checks and balances to keep a Federal Government limited. He states;
“If you make the citizens of this country agree to become the subjects of one great consolidated empire of American, your government will not have sufficient energy to keep them together. Such a government is incompatible with the genius of republicanism. There will be no checks, no real balances, in this government.”
Henry believes this proposed government is incompatible with republicanism and the supposed checks and balances will not be sufficient. Henry is also concerned with the fact that this new government not only would have no check on its becoming a tyranny but also would have the means to carry out that tyranny. As he suggests in the following statement:
“It has been repeatedly said here, that the great object of a national government was national defense. That power which is said to be intended for security and safety may be rendered detestable and oppressive. “
Henry is right to be concerned if his belief that the government would become a tyranny, then the tools used for national defense could be inflicted upon the citizens of the nation.
It is interesting to note that Madison did address these concerns. Madison argues that the checks and balances would in fact keep the government from becoming a tyranny. Madison states;
“When we come to the Senate, its members are elected by the states in their equal and political capacity. But had the government been completely consolidated, the Senate would have been chosen by the people in their individual capacity, in the same manner as the members of the other house. Thus it is of a complicated nature, and this complication, I trust, will be found to exclude the evils of absolute consolidation, as well as of a mere confederacy.
What is interesting about both arguments is both are right. Looking at the historical record, the country was in no danger of the failure of the checks and balances as the Constitution intended. Until the year 1913, the Senate was elected by the States as Madison describes. Madison was right stating as long as the states elected Senators, Henry’s consolidated government problem would not occur. In 1913, though the states were removed from the election process and today it would seem Henry’s fears may be coming true. Without the states to place a check on the Federal Government, it has grown exponentially and is involved in far more than the Constitution ever assigned to the Government. It can be argued that the so called “security” laws passed in the last few years could be construed as potential problems anticipated by Henry. Henry anticipates these issues with this statement;
“With respect to that part of the proposal; which says that every power not granted remains with the people, it must be previous to adoption, or it will involve this country in inevitable destruction. To talk of it as a thing subsequent, not as one of your unalienable rights, is leaving it to the causal opinion of the Congress who shall take up the consideration of the matter. They will not reason with you about the effect of this Constitution, the will not take the opinion of this committee concerning its operation. They will construe it as they please.”
Henry is arguing the concept of all rights are held by the people should be clearly defined as unalienable and existing outside the context of the constitution. His fear is that the way the Constitution is written, Congress can define anything they want regarding the governments power and what is a right of the people. It is interesting to note that Madison argued for this same fear against the Bill of Rights years later. Today in the 21st century, it is clear that Congress is in fact doing as they please with rights. Concepts like privileges as opposed to rights, debates about the second amendment or a right to privacy should not take place, yet as Henry anticipated Congress has granted itself these powers over rights that should not have existed.
Madison goes further in his debate to describe his other check and balance to keep the Federal Government limited. Madison states;
“When, therefore, direct taxes are not necessary, they will not be recurred to. It can be of little advantage to those in power to raise money in a manner oppressive t the people. To consult the conveniences of the people will cost them nothing, and in many respects will be advantageous to them. Direct taxes will only be recurred to for great purposes.”
Madison describes that the other check on the Federal government is limiting the money available to the government. Note that direct taxes as originally defined in the Constitution were not allowed unless there was a reason for those taxes, when the reason was over, so the taxes ended.. Money and an army are the two things needed for a tyranny to function. The states control over the senate and funding was to be the check on tyranny. This worked fine until 1913, when an amendment was passed removing this restriction and the last check on the federal government designed to prevent what Patrick Henry was concerned about. Since that time the Federal government has become the consolidated entity Henry feared.
In conclusion it would appear both men were correct. The checks and balances Madison identified as protection from a consolidated government, specifically he states electing Senators and restricting the national government’s taxable resources did in fact work until those checks were removed. The federal government was able to perform its duties without expanding into areas not originally tasked to the central government. It is also true that once the two checks were removed, the government has become what Henry feared. A consolidated entity that will interpret any thing they want into the government’s supposed responsibility and use the threat of force to obtain the money needed to enforce it.
Madison argues further about the type of government that Henry was proposing in keeping the current government of the time. Madison describes how Henry is complaining about the stricter requirements for amending the constitution. Madison argues;
“He[Henry] complains of this Constitution, because it requires the consent of at least three fourths of the states to introduce amendments which shall be necessary for the happiness of the people. The assent of so many he urges as too great an obstacle to the admission of salutary amendments, which, he strongly insists, ought to be at the will of a bare majority.”
Madison is correct in his statement about republics. The belief of republican government was that direct democracy is not good nor is minority rule. As seen today, certain states have laws being passed not by legislatures but directly by the people. This bypasses the safety of a republican government and opens the door to “mob” rule as the Founders defined it. At the same time in the 21st century, the smallest minority, meaning small group or even an individual can force his will, beliefs or needs onto the majority with the force of government being used to enforce this. The fears of both men exist in some form today because the original design of the constitution was changed. It remains to be seen if a tyranny will develop.
Patrick Henry did over react in his argument against the constitution. Overall this republic has been successful. Henry did not anticipate that it would take well over 140 years for the government to become what he feared. Instead of arguing against the constitution, he could have looked for a way to prevent the problems that exist today. James Madison did put too much faith in the people. The founders did not put a check to prevent the government from removing the checks and balances protecting the people from the government. Both men recognized the concept of unalienable rights though neither of these men pushed to have the concept defined better in the constitution. These problems may not have affected the early republic but are certainly affecting the United States today. Every year more rights are declared privileges by the government and the government continues to believe it has a blank check on everyone’s personal income together these represent Patrick Henry’s consolidated government, which no longer pays attention to the citizens and the government obtaining the financial means to carry out any kind of plan it wants good or bad.
Both men debated well and the arguments have both been proven right and wrong over time. One of Patrick Henry’s main arguments was about the checks and balances to keep a Federal Government limited. He states;
“If you make the citizens of this country agree to become the subjects of one great consolidated empire of American, your government will not have sufficient energy to keep them together. Such a government is incompatible with the genius of republicanism. There will be no checks, no real balances, in this government.”
Henry believes this proposed government is incompatible with republicanism and the supposed checks and balances will not be sufficient. Henry is also concerned with the fact that this new government not only would have no check on its becoming a tyranny but also would have the means to carry out that tyranny. As he suggests in the following statement:
“It has been repeatedly said here, that the great object of a national government was national defense. That power which is said to be intended for security and safety may be rendered detestable and oppressive. “
Henry is right to be concerned if his belief that the government would become a tyranny, then the tools used for national defense could be inflicted upon the citizens of the nation.
It is interesting to note that Madison did address these concerns. Madison argues that the checks and balances would in fact keep the government from becoming a tyranny. Madison states;
“When we come to the Senate, its members are elected by the states in their equal and political capacity. But had the government been completely consolidated, the Senate would have been chosen by the people in their individual capacity, in the same manner as the members of the other house. Thus it is of a complicated nature, and this complication, I trust, will be found to exclude the evils of absolute consolidation, as well as of a mere confederacy.
What is interesting about both arguments is both are right. Looking at the historical record, the country was in no danger of the failure of the checks and balances as the Constitution intended. Until the year 1913, the Senate was elected by the States as Madison describes. Madison was right stating as long as the states elected Senators, Henry’s consolidated government problem would not occur. In 1913, though the states were removed from the election process and today it would seem Henry’s fears may be coming true. Without the states to place a check on the Federal Government, it has grown exponentially and is involved in far more than the Constitution ever assigned to the Government. It can be argued that the so called “security” laws passed in the last few years could be construed as potential problems anticipated by Henry. Henry anticipates these issues with this statement;
“With respect to that part of the proposal; which says that every power not granted remains with the people, it must be previous to adoption, or it will involve this country in inevitable destruction. To talk of it as a thing subsequent, not as one of your unalienable rights, is leaving it to the causal opinion of the Congress who shall take up the consideration of the matter. They will not reason with you about the effect of this Constitution, the will not take the opinion of this committee concerning its operation. They will construe it as they please.”
Henry is arguing the concept of all rights are held by the people should be clearly defined as unalienable and existing outside the context of the constitution. His fear is that the way the Constitution is written, Congress can define anything they want regarding the governments power and what is a right of the people. It is interesting to note that Madison argued for this same fear against the Bill of Rights years later. Today in the 21st century, it is clear that Congress is in fact doing as they please with rights. Concepts like privileges as opposed to rights, debates about the second amendment or a right to privacy should not take place, yet as Henry anticipated Congress has granted itself these powers over rights that should not have existed.
Madison goes further in his debate to describe his other check and balance to keep the Federal Government limited. Madison states;
“When, therefore, direct taxes are not necessary, they will not be recurred to. It can be of little advantage to those in power to raise money in a manner oppressive t the people. To consult the conveniences of the people will cost them nothing, and in many respects will be advantageous to them. Direct taxes will only be recurred to for great purposes.”
Madison describes that the other check on the Federal government is limiting the money available to the government. Note that direct taxes as originally defined in the Constitution were not allowed unless there was a reason for those taxes, when the reason was over, so the taxes ended.. Money and an army are the two things needed for a tyranny to function. The states control over the senate and funding was to be the check on tyranny. This worked fine until 1913, when an amendment was passed removing this restriction and the last check on the federal government designed to prevent what Patrick Henry was concerned about. Since that time the Federal government has become the consolidated entity Henry feared.
In conclusion it would appear both men were correct. The checks and balances Madison identified as protection from a consolidated government, specifically he states electing Senators and restricting the national government’s taxable resources did in fact work until those checks were removed. The federal government was able to perform its duties without expanding into areas not originally tasked to the central government. It is also true that once the two checks were removed, the government has become what Henry feared. A consolidated entity that will interpret any thing they want into the government’s supposed responsibility and use the threat of force to obtain the money needed to enforce it.
Madison argues further about the type of government that Henry was proposing in keeping the current government of the time. Madison describes how Henry is complaining about the stricter requirements for amending the constitution. Madison argues;
“He[Henry] complains of this Constitution, because it requires the consent of at least three fourths of the states to introduce amendments which shall be necessary for the happiness of the people. The assent of so many he urges as too great an obstacle to the admission of salutary amendments, which, he strongly insists, ought to be at the will of a bare majority.”
Madison is correct in his statement about republics. The belief of republican government was that direct democracy is not good nor is minority rule. As seen today, certain states have laws being passed not by legislatures but directly by the people. This bypasses the safety of a republican government and opens the door to “mob” rule as the Founders defined it. At the same time in the 21st century, the smallest minority, meaning small group or even an individual can force his will, beliefs or needs onto the majority with the force of government being used to enforce this. The fears of both men exist in some form today because the original design of the constitution was changed. It remains to be seen if a tyranny will develop.
Patrick Henry did over react in his argument against the constitution. Overall this republic has been successful. Henry did not anticipate that it would take well over 140 years for the government to become what he feared. Instead of arguing against the constitution, he could have looked for a way to prevent the problems that exist today. James Madison did put too much faith in the people. The founders did not put a check to prevent the government from removing the checks and balances protecting the people from the government. Both men recognized the concept of unalienable rights though neither of these men pushed to have the concept defined better in the constitution. These problems may not have affected the early republic but are certainly affecting the United States today. Every year more rights are declared privileges by the government and the government continues to believe it has a blank check on everyone’s personal income together these represent Patrick Henry’s consolidated government, which no longer pays attention to the citizens and the government obtaining the financial means to carry out any kind of plan it wants good or bad.
Government American style is impossible if bad traditions and bad parts of culture exist.
The United States has been around for over 200 years. It is arguably the oldest surviving government that has never had any changes. The United States is by far the most prosperous country in the world. So the question is why has no other country anywhere in the last 233 years ever tried government American style.
In all cases of the hundreds of countries they try despotism, communism, totalitarianism, theocracies all of which are horrendous and result in millions of people dead and the ones still alive poor, starving and defacto slaves to the elite few. If none of these nightmares are chosen they will choose European parliamentary style governments.
Granted most European countries and Japan are doing ok but the reality is they were also built back up with free money from the US after WWII, so it is easy to be prosperous, when you get a leg up. However, all of those countries still have racism running rampant, they have higher unemployment, higher taxes, higher costs of living and so called "free" services like healthcare that will likely leave you dead before you get that heart bypass and the former colonies and other countries are even worse off than the Europeans. Parlimentary style government is certainly better than all of those other choices mentioned but is it really the best choice?
These countries still pass discriminatory laws, they support class division, they are highly taxed societies or societies that are little better than the totalitarian ones with how poor the places are and what services are provided. Most of these places have very little GDP, low salaries and nearly all of them are a coalition break up away from total collapse of the government.
But even with all of that, you would think one out of the 200+ countries would have said, lets try it the american way, instead of the way of our colonial oppressors.
So why not choose American style constutional republics for a government.
The success of the American Constitution and its Government is a result of removing old world traditions and cultural influences that were unproductive or detrimental.
You can't have aristocrats, classes, untouchables, emporers, warlords, chiefs and caliphs in America. You cant have bibles or sharias or zen be the final say in law and what is right or wrong in America. You cant have religion in charge nor the rule by divine right.
To be like america each individual citizen is equal too all others under the law. You can't legislate their thoughts of behavior and you certainly can't dictate what an American does with thier life. To be an American style government each person needs freedom and protection of that freedom, without exception, especially protection from the government and aristocrats.
That is what is common about every other country. NONE of them will give up the parts of their cultures or the bad traditions that create the classes and conditons of the old world. None of those countries will give their people equal freedom. Without being able to leave behind the traditions of the old world, you can't use an American Style government.
Still, you would think one country somewhere would gove success and prosperity a try.
In all cases of the hundreds of countries they try despotism, communism, totalitarianism, theocracies all of which are horrendous and result in millions of people dead and the ones still alive poor, starving and defacto slaves to the elite few. If none of these nightmares are chosen they will choose European parliamentary style governments.
Granted most European countries and Japan are doing ok but the reality is they were also built back up with free money from the US after WWII, so it is easy to be prosperous, when you get a leg up. However, all of those countries still have racism running rampant, they have higher unemployment, higher taxes, higher costs of living and so called "free" services like healthcare that will likely leave you dead before you get that heart bypass and the former colonies and other countries are even worse off than the Europeans. Parlimentary style government is certainly better than all of those other choices mentioned but is it really the best choice?
These countries still pass discriminatory laws, they support class division, they are highly taxed societies or societies that are little better than the totalitarian ones with how poor the places are and what services are provided. Most of these places have very little GDP, low salaries and nearly all of them are a coalition break up away from total collapse of the government.
But even with all of that, you would think one out of the 200+ countries would have said, lets try it the american way, instead of the way of our colonial oppressors.
So why not choose American style constutional republics for a government.
The success of the American Constitution and its Government is a result of removing old world traditions and cultural influences that were unproductive or detrimental.
You can't have aristocrats, classes, untouchables, emporers, warlords, chiefs and caliphs in America. You cant have bibles or sharias or zen be the final say in law and what is right or wrong in America. You cant have religion in charge nor the rule by divine right.
To be like america each individual citizen is equal too all others under the law. You can't legislate their thoughts of behavior and you certainly can't dictate what an American does with thier life. To be an American style government each person needs freedom and protection of that freedom, without exception, especially protection from the government and aristocrats.
That is what is common about every other country. NONE of them will give up the parts of their cultures or the bad traditions that create the classes and conditons of the old world. None of those countries will give their people equal freedom. Without being able to leave behind the traditions of the old world, you can't use an American Style government.
Still, you would think one country somewhere would gove success and prosperity a try.
Need to build a bridge? Forget skilled labor or caucasian males, according to The Prophet Obama's Economic team
Caucasians need not apply, apparently is the change the Prophet Obama is promoting. His economic advisor, Robert Reich spoke before Charlie Rangel and his committee, link below as well as posted on his blog :
"The Stimulus: How to Create Jobs Without Them All Going to Skilled Professionals and White Male Construction Workers"
So the first problem with this is of course, just how can you build a road or bridge or any other project without skilled professionals. Really, Mr Prophet and friends, are you actually going to hire unskilled labor to put together a bridge? The obvious answer is no, but I think the Political Shaman can safely say that we have some really dumb people in charge now if they plan to do this.
The other statement about white construction workers is simply blatant racism. If that statement had been said about any other race or group besides Caucasian males the uproar and protests from the left would have been insane but the Political Shaman is already aware it is legal to harass and discriminate against Caucasians and any males anytime you want. In fact, discriminating against Caucasians is encouraged by the liberal democrats running America. Besides the derogatory term of "white" which infers all Caucasians are racists, want segregation and are descendants of former slave owners, the audacity to bring back the proverbial no whites need apply signs in each employer's window is simply reprehensible.
What happened to the liberals complaints of racial profiling? I suppose as long as you are profiling Caucasians, then profiling is ok.
With the Prophet's team is using derogatory terms to describe Caucasians, blatantly being racist by declaring that Caucasians will get no part of stimulus packages, The Prophet Obama remains entirely silent on what is apparently new Jim Crow laws to discriminate against Caucasians and apparently keep Caucasians poor while preferred races are assisted to a better life in this recession.
It should be noted that most of the money used to make this stimulus package comes from Caucasians. This is true neo-marxism, set yourself up as an elite, choose a victim to keep you elected and opress a group through law and the media to pay for it all.
Thank you democrat voters for ensuring the democrats create their progressive eutopia, whats next aparthied where Caucasians have no rights at all?
I suppose if your goal is to implement the failed FDR economic plan to create a new depression, you have to have some group to oppress, so you can pay for it and have someone to blame.
http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2009/01/stimulus-how-to-create-jobs-without.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opxuUj6vFa4
"The Stimulus: How to Create Jobs Without Them All Going to Skilled Professionals and White Male Construction Workers"
So the first problem with this is of course, just how can you build a road or bridge or any other project without skilled professionals. Really, Mr Prophet and friends, are you actually going to hire unskilled labor to put together a bridge? The obvious answer is no, but I think the Political Shaman can safely say that we have some really dumb people in charge now if they plan to do this.
The other statement about white construction workers is simply blatant racism. If that statement had been said about any other race or group besides Caucasian males the uproar and protests from the left would have been insane but the Political Shaman is already aware it is legal to harass and discriminate against Caucasians and any males anytime you want. In fact, discriminating against Caucasians is encouraged by the liberal democrats running America. Besides the derogatory term of "white" which infers all Caucasians are racists, want segregation and are descendants of former slave owners, the audacity to bring back the proverbial no whites need apply signs in each employer's window is simply reprehensible.
What happened to the liberals complaints of racial profiling? I suppose as long as you are profiling Caucasians, then profiling is ok.
With the Prophet's team is using derogatory terms to describe Caucasians, blatantly being racist by declaring that Caucasians will get no part of stimulus packages, The Prophet Obama remains entirely silent on what is apparently new Jim Crow laws to discriminate against Caucasians and apparently keep Caucasians poor while preferred races are assisted to a better life in this recession.
It should be noted that most of the money used to make this stimulus package comes from Caucasians. This is true neo-marxism, set yourself up as an elite, choose a victim to keep you elected and opress a group through law and the media to pay for it all.
Thank you democrat voters for ensuring the democrats create their progressive eutopia, whats next aparthied where Caucasians have no rights at all?
I suppose if your goal is to implement the failed FDR economic plan to create a new depression, you have to have some group to oppress, so you can pay for it and have someone to blame.
http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2009/01/stimulus-how-to-create-jobs-without.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opxuUj6vFa4
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Current Statistics of the United States, just so we know what the Prophet is starting with.
The Prophet Obama has started to take control of the United States. Being the first full day in office it is very unlikely his magic wand is fully charged and therefore will not solve all problems instantly as the democrat voters believe he will. Lets ensure that we record the statistics of today. It would seem prudent to record this information, so it can be compared to the future marxist eutopia that the Prophet Obama, Queen Pelosi and Court Jester Reid are promising to inflict on the population. It would help to know how much damage they do, since the Media of Truth, will likely ensure that all bad news is somehow portrayed as good. The Political Shaman can predict that most bad news will be reported in the context of "we need to sacrifice" and "we all need to wait it out" with statistics themselves rewritten to appear better by simply rewriting the past, which is to say find a way to not publish the information in the blog again.
Because Queen Pelosi and Court Jester Reid were in power at the time of record for all of this data and The Prophet Obama was a Senator we can blame them for the current state of the Economy. Bush may have been president and Bush could not have done anything without Pelosi and Reid passing the laws to do it. Bush can be blamed for not using his Veto power to prevent the massive liberal spending on corporate welfare certainly and not controlling the spending of the democrats who have been in power for 2 years.
These numbers come from the government and news sources. Economic data from the government is from November and December. This is the most recent official data but again can be considered because Obama was a senator and the current congress in power and could have prevented things from becoming the economy of today. A future post will have the January numbers.
Since the Prophet Obama was in fact a Senator in 2008 it would be incorrect to state he inherited these numbers since he was already in a position to do something about them. Now that we have the facts recorded, we can safely measure what the democrats inflict us with in the coming two years.
GDP $14.412 Trillion
GDP Growth -.5%
deficit $455 Billion
national debt $10.6 Trillion
The cost of a liberal government $4.150 Trillion
The Feds all important interest rate .18
Poverty Rate 12.5%
crime -3.5%
Oil price $41 per barrel
inflation 2.0%
Unemployment rate 6.7%
DOW 8022.53
NASDAQ 1458.58
S$P 500 814.21
New Liberal Corporate welfare (stimulus for 09) $850 Billion
The Prophet Obama's Popularity 60%
Queen Pelosi's Popularity 39%
Note: Court Jester Reid's is apparently so unpopular no polling agency has determined his popularity as of the date of publication of this blog post.
http://www.treasury.gov/economic-plan/economy.pdf
http://www.treasury.gov/offices/economic-policy/macroecon/monthly_economic_data.pdf
http://www.bea.gov/national/index.htm#gdp
http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/GovView.asp
http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p60-235.pdf
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np
http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=56467
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/18/us/politics/18poll.html
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/2008prelim/index.html
http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=INDEXDJX:DJI
http://www.nasdaq.com/
http://www2.standardandpoors.com/portal/site/sp/en/us/page.topic/indices_rtv/2,3,1,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.html
http://www.federalreserve.gov/Releases/H15/update/
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2007/06/californians-sa.html
Because Queen Pelosi and Court Jester Reid were in power at the time of record for all of this data and The Prophet Obama was a Senator we can blame them for the current state of the Economy. Bush may have been president and Bush could not have done anything without Pelosi and Reid passing the laws to do it. Bush can be blamed for not using his Veto power to prevent the massive liberal spending on corporate welfare certainly and not controlling the spending of the democrats who have been in power for 2 years.
These numbers come from the government and news sources. Economic data from the government is from November and December. This is the most recent official data but again can be considered because Obama was a senator and the current congress in power and could have prevented things from becoming the economy of today. A future post will have the January numbers.
Since the Prophet Obama was in fact a Senator in 2008 it would be incorrect to state he inherited these numbers since he was already in a position to do something about them. Now that we have the facts recorded, we can safely measure what the democrats inflict us with in the coming two years.
GDP $14.412 Trillion
GDP Growth -.5%
deficit $455 Billion
national debt $10.6 Trillion
The cost of a liberal government $4.150 Trillion
The Feds all important interest rate .18
Poverty Rate 12.5%
crime -3.5%
Oil price $41 per barrel
inflation 2.0%
Unemployment rate 6.7%
DOW 8022.53
NASDAQ 1458.58
S$P 500 814.21
New Liberal Corporate welfare (stimulus for 09) $850 Billion
The Prophet Obama's Popularity 60%
Queen Pelosi's Popularity 39%
Note: Court Jester Reid's is apparently so unpopular no polling agency has determined his popularity as of the date of publication of this blog post.
http://www.treasury.gov/economic-plan/economy.pdf
http://www.treasury.gov/offices/economic-policy/macroecon/monthly_economic_data.pdf
http://www.bea.gov/national/index.htm#gdp
http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/GovView.asp
http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p60-235.pdf
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np
http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=56467
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/18/us/politics/18poll.html
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/2008prelim/index.html
http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=INDEXDJX:DJI
http://www.nasdaq.com/
http://www2.standardandpoors.com/portal/site/sp/en/us/page.topic/indices_rtv/2,3,1,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.html
http://www.federalreserve.gov/Releases/H15/update/
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2007/06/californians-sa.html
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
4 days of parties costing millions, I thought the democrats were the party of the downtrodden, now we know the truth
The liberal socialist democrats have been in DC for almost 2 days with 2 more planned of non stop parties. Be proud democrat voters, the liberal moviestars, rockstars, media and of course the liberal politicians are spending massive amounts of your money to basically party for 4 days.
Now before the Ministry of Truth (aka the media) alter this fact into some claim the money was donated, I point out the previously mentioned funding provided for some of this fun from FEMA money.
However, even if all of the money was donated, what happened to the poor and downtrodden you liberals are constantly harping about saving, or the environment? I would think the money for four days of parties would pay for a large number of homeless family to have some meals for that four days.
I guess the liberal politicians and stars are exactly what they appear to be, elitist eurostyle wannabe aristocrats who really have no interest in anything but their own power and money all taken from the people they claim to be saving.
So while there are people who do not have bread to eat going hungry for tonight, I will ask again, does this mean the elitist democrats will let them eat the cake left over from all of the parties?
Now before the Ministry of Truth (aka the media) alter this fact into some claim the money was donated, I point out the previously mentioned funding provided for some of this fun from FEMA money.
However, even if all of the money was donated, what happened to the poor and downtrodden you liberals are constantly harping about saving, or the environment? I would think the money for four days of parties would pay for a large number of homeless family to have some meals for that four days.
I guess the liberal politicians and stars are exactly what they appear to be, elitist eurostyle wannabe aristocrats who really have no interest in anything but their own power and money all taken from the people they claim to be saving.
So while there are people who do not have bread to eat going hungry for tonight, I will ask again, does this mean the elitist democrats will let them eat the cake left over from all of the parties?
All hail the Prophet Obama, King of the Democrats, ruler of America
The Political Shaman recommends communicating appropriate acknowledgment of the ascendancy of the elite liberal socialist democrats as they assume complete control of the United States.
It seems prudent to avoid the Ministry of Love the democrats will need for the socialist and environmentalist utopia they are about to inflict on the currently free citizens of the United States. The Ministry of Love will be overworked as the democrats begin the process of raising taxes, raising the deficit far worse than anytime and all with the end result of turning this recession into a depression. After all, the democrats according to Rahm, like to exploit crisis conditions and what could be better for the democrats than a depression they can create. I believe the Prophet is set to raise the deficit today in fact. Lets see if he can manage to do it.
Have some hope, eventually the democrat's Ministry of Truth will kick in with the help of their media buddies and we won't even know anything bad is happening. Ignorance is Strength, is what the democrats are hoping for.
So all give homage to the Prophet Obama, he is the new king.
It seems prudent to avoid the Ministry of Love the democrats will need for the socialist and environmentalist utopia they are about to inflict on the currently free citizens of the United States. The Ministry of Love will be overworked as the democrats begin the process of raising taxes, raising the deficit far worse than anytime and all with the end result of turning this recession into a depression. After all, the democrats according to Rahm, like to exploit crisis conditions and what could be better for the democrats than a depression they can create. I believe the Prophet is set to raise the deficit today in fact. Lets see if he can manage to do it.
Have some hope, eventually the democrat's Ministry of Truth will kick in with the help of their media buddies and we won't even know anything bad is happening. Ignorance is Strength, is what the democrats are hoping for.
So all give homage to the Prophet Obama, he is the new king.
Monday, January 19, 2009
Rahm Emmanual's Rule One is to exploit a crisis for promoting socialist liberal agendas and programs, while pretending they are helping victims.
The Chief of Staff of the Prophet Obama is quoted in the NY times as stating the following in an interview on Face the Nation, a few months ago on.
“Rule one: Never allow a crisis to go to waste,” Mr. Emanuel said in an interview on Sunday. “They are opportunities to do big things.”
Now that the Prophet Obama will be crowned king of the democrats tomorrow this complete the triumvirate of power for the socialist like political party Obama leads. The party will have complete control of the House and Senate as well as the Executive office. They are only one or two votes short of filibuster proof control (we wont know until the democrats have finished "finding" ballot boxes and "determining the intent of the voter" in Minnesota).
With such a small margin of filibuster possibilities and the complete control of the mainstream media, the democrats have defacto complete power.
So with this power Obama's chief of staff has this Rule One, which seems pretty clear that democrats count on crisis and calamity to happen so they can exploit them for their own agendas. Since the democrats agendas are all liberal marxist programs intended to make us all equally poor and themselves the only elites, you can imagine how worried we should be. The Prophet Obama, Queen Pelosi, Court Jester Ried, all of the Clintonistas and most other democrats have promised increased taxes, they will enact nonsense like Carbon pollution selling programs, which will cause more inflation, they have promised to continue to promote ethanol and other fuels that will raise the cost of food and they have promised a wonderful, European style healthcare system that will render most people dead at an early age because you have to wait 3 years to get a bypass surgery. We must not forget the Pelosi backed plan to confiscate a massive percentage of all 401ks and other retirement funds to place in Social Secutiry. Not a bad list of "big things".
The Political Shaman can easily predict the "big things" Rahm Emmanuel refers too, the democrats have been demanding and promising to inflict us with this stuff for 15 years if not longer. Democrat voters you do realize that Rahm is telling you that you are too stupid to think. Instead of perhaps helping the people in this crisis he refers too, his Rule One is to exploit the people by pushing for unrelated stuff and pretending it is somehow resolving the crisis. A moral thinking individual would resolve a crisis and assist those affected within reason, not use the crisis for promotion of unrelated ideology and programs at the expense of the suffering of victims of a crisis.
Is it possible that the democrat voters really are as stupid as the Democrat politicians hope?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/us/politics/10obama.html?_r=1&ref=politics
“Rule one: Never allow a crisis to go to waste,” Mr. Emanuel said in an interview on Sunday. “They are opportunities to do big things.”
Now that the Prophet Obama will be crowned king of the democrats tomorrow this complete the triumvirate of power for the socialist like political party Obama leads. The party will have complete control of the House and Senate as well as the Executive office. They are only one or two votes short of filibuster proof control (we wont know until the democrats have finished "finding" ballot boxes and "determining the intent of the voter" in Minnesota).
With such a small margin of filibuster possibilities and the complete control of the mainstream media, the democrats have defacto complete power.
So with this power Obama's chief of staff has this Rule One, which seems pretty clear that democrats count on crisis and calamity to happen so they can exploit them for their own agendas. Since the democrats agendas are all liberal marxist programs intended to make us all equally poor and themselves the only elites, you can imagine how worried we should be. The Prophet Obama, Queen Pelosi, Court Jester Ried, all of the Clintonistas and most other democrats have promised increased taxes, they will enact nonsense like Carbon pollution selling programs, which will cause more inflation, they have promised to continue to promote ethanol and other fuels that will raise the cost of food and they have promised a wonderful, European style healthcare system that will render most people dead at an early age because you have to wait 3 years to get a bypass surgery. We must not forget the Pelosi backed plan to confiscate a massive percentage of all 401ks and other retirement funds to place in Social Secutiry. Not a bad list of "big things".
The Political Shaman can easily predict the "big things" Rahm Emmanuel refers too, the democrats have been demanding and promising to inflict us with this stuff for 15 years if not longer. Democrat voters you do realize that Rahm is telling you that you are too stupid to think. Instead of perhaps helping the people in this crisis he refers too, his Rule One is to exploit the people by pushing for unrelated stuff and pretending it is somehow resolving the crisis. A moral thinking individual would resolve a crisis and assist those affected within reason, not use the crisis for promotion of unrelated ideology and programs at the expense of the suffering of victims of a crisis.
Is it possible that the democrat voters really are as stupid as the Democrat politicians hope?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/us/politics/10obama.html?_r=1&ref=politics
Sunday, January 18, 2009
The Prophet Obama will be annointed King of the Democrats, since we have no bread, will the democrats let us eat cake?
Hear Ye Hear Ye, The democrats get to anoint their king, Tuesday. A day filled with glee and happiness for the Prophet after his long 2 year struggle of ignoring his senate responsibilities so he could pursue becoming president.
Excuse me while I remain very disappointed in the democrat voters for inflicting us yet again with a democrat congress and president, who have spent the last month ensuring they will do everything possible from raising taxes to spending more in one year on welfare(corporate welfare) than the entire 8 years of Bush. Thank you democrats, I really would rather have this recession turned into a depression like you did years ago, or are you going for a 70s economy. Since there is no good decade when democrats ruled everything, I can only assume a repeat of one of the many bad times you democrats ruled. What is certain is the politicians NEVER learn from the past and will repeat history, we can expect they will repeat some bad decade, such as FDR's folly, while the Prophet Obama, Queen Pelosi, Court Jester Reid and their democrat comrades all rule America. Since history will be repeated I can only assume the liberal elitists who are running this country will send us cake after they have taken all of our money for bread.
It would help if the liberal biased media actually did not rewrite history, since the democrat voters seem to let the liberal media think for them, the media could at least tell their followers what really happened in the past. Well in fairness to the democrat voters, I don't believe concepts like actual history nor facts about politicians are part of that newspeak languange the liberals use.
Well what could be expected. The liberal, socialist, progressive democrats only have part of their court ready with Queen Pelosi and Court Jester Ried, so it makes sense they should try to have their king. Divine right and all of that nonsense, I believe it is called, so who better for a king to rule by divine right than a messiah like prophet.
All hail the Prophet Obama...KING of the Democrats.
Excuse me while I remain very disappointed in the democrat voters for inflicting us yet again with a democrat congress and president, who have spent the last month ensuring they will do everything possible from raising taxes to spending more in one year on welfare(corporate welfare) than the entire 8 years of Bush. Thank you democrats, I really would rather have this recession turned into a depression like you did years ago, or are you going for a 70s economy. Since there is no good decade when democrats ruled everything, I can only assume a repeat of one of the many bad times you democrats ruled. What is certain is the politicians NEVER learn from the past and will repeat history, we can expect they will repeat some bad decade, such as FDR's folly, while the Prophet Obama, Queen Pelosi, Court Jester Reid and their democrat comrades all rule America. Since history will be repeated I can only assume the liberal elitists who are running this country will send us cake after they have taken all of our money for bread.
It would help if the liberal biased media actually did not rewrite history, since the democrat voters seem to let the liberal media think for them, the media could at least tell their followers what really happened in the past. Well in fairness to the democrat voters, I don't believe concepts like actual history nor facts about politicians are part of that newspeak languange the liberals use.
Well what could be expected. The liberal, socialist, progressive democrats only have part of their court ready with Queen Pelosi and Court Jester Ried, so it makes sense they should try to have their king. Divine right and all of that nonsense, I believe it is called, so who better for a king to rule by divine right than a messiah like prophet.
All hail the Prophet Obama...KING of the Democrats.
Thursday, January 15, 2009
The Prophet Obama has high approval ratings...blah blah blah
It was reported today that the Prophet Obama has high approval ratings and "everyone" loves him. Well that is nice.
The Political Shaman will predict that no matter what happens the media will never have an approval rating for Obama that is ever less than showing everyone loves him.
It is typical behavior for socialist/progressive/liberal democrats. After all their so called leaders do everything from carnal pleasures in the white house, leaving a woman to drown, selling Senate seats and who knows what else and yet they still keep those people. The Prophet Obama is worse because of the messiah complex, I mean who ever gets upset with Messiahs - or Prophets for that matter. This is the only way to explain how fools in other countries with the more extreme forms of socialism continue to let their despotic rulers oppress them.
Just like the fools who loved FDR for turning a recession into a depression and delaying getting into a war until soldiers in Pearl Harbor were killed, the Prophet Obama is set to do at least as much damage as FDR and the liberals you can be assured the media will never report on a poll showing Obama is anything but perfect.
Too bad the democrats and others who voted for the Prophet and continue to give him favorable approval ratings continue to let the media think for them, instead of thinking for themselves.
The Political Shaman will predict that no matter what happens the media will never have an approval rating for Obama that is ever less than showing everyone loves him.
It is typical behavior for socialist/progressive/liberal democrats. After all their so called leaders do everything from carnal pleasures in the white house, leaving a woman to drown, selling Senate seats and who knows what else and yet they still keep those people. The Prophet Obama is worse because of the messiah complex, I mean who ever gets upset with Messiahs - or Prophets for that matter. This is the only way to explain how fools in other countries with the more extreme forms of socialism continue to let their despotic rulers oppress them.
Just like the fools who loved FDR for turning a recession into a depression and delaying getting into a war until soldiers in Pearl Harbor were killed, the Prophet Obama is set to do at least as much damage as FDR and the liberals you can be assured the media will never report on a poll showing Obama is anything but perfect.
Too bad the democrats and others who voted for the Prophet and continue to give him favorable approval ratings continue to let the media think for them, instead of thinking for themselves.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)